The rivalry between Steaua and Dinamo might have been created by the communist regime, but it lasts way beyond that dark period, when the two clubs were wrestling for trophies using all means at hand. Now, it’s all about financial strength and it was no surprise to see Dinamo struggle to keep up with Becali’s high investment in players (and the great decade of Arpad Paszkany’s CFR Cluj), but the gap seems to get bigger with every season.
After a long process, the Red Dogs finally changed ownership and Ionut Negoita decided to try and hurt Steaua using a wiser and cheaper plan, aware that he lacked the financial strentgh to fight Steaua on the transfer market: Dinamo was ready to invest small money and pay low wages for young players with potential to follow the path of Marius Alexe or Constantin Nica, both raised by the club and sold this summer to Serie A clubs. That required some good work in scouting and recruiting, top coaching and a lot of patience. Well, after 8 rounds, when Negoita decided to release the experienced coach Gheorghe Multescu, as “the team needs a wake-up call”, it became clear, at least to me, that the Bucharest side lacks all of the above… And that Dinamo’s bosses didn’t read Soccernomics :), a book that makes some interesting points regarding how much can a coach raise the level of a team or how much results depend on the wages the players are getting…
In truth, it wasn’t Multescu’s fault that in this first couple of months Dinamo struggled, looked average most of the times and promising once or twice. The work in recruitment was extremely poor, with unproven African players (Fai, Zougoula, Pape), rejected Romanian players (Grecu, Mardare) and poor foreign players with some experience in Liga I (Durimel, Thomas, Hasanovic) unable to add quality. Some promise arrived from the youth team, as Romania U19 international Dorin Rotariu netted his first goals in Liga 1, and maybe this is Multescu’s only fault: he gave more credit to the club’s new signings rather than to the 17-18-19 years old raised in the club’s youth system. And, having seen them, I can say that there’s more talent there than on a transfer market Dinamo has no ability to exploit.
Apart from that, it’s all down to the management, who asked for a reconstruction, but also for a European spot at the end of the season. In light of this firm goal, Multescu was on the wrong path, having collected 9 points in 8 rounds, but how can you ask for both, considering that Dinamo has failed repeatedly to finish among the top teams in recent years, when there was no reconstruction in place? That’s just nonsense and the new coach, the inexperienced Flavius Stoican, will realize it soon enough. Dinamo’s problem is that the new board won’t…
Romania’s national team might be a joke, but you won’t feel like laughing if you look at those coming from behind, currently playing for the youth national teams. You just realize that it’s going to be a long time before you’ll see once again Romania playing at a decent level. Recently, the U16 coach, Adrian Bumbescu, has been sacked for some terrible results, including a 1-10 defeat to the
hands feet of the mighty Germans, and similar heads could continue to fall, but that won’t solve the main problem: the national team coaches (we could have better ones than those selected on dodgy criteria) get their players from the (not so) professional league and clubs. And those do little to nothing when it comes to nurturing and promoting young talent…
Because the sport newspapers are busy reporting Becali’s life behind bars and the drinking adventures of Gabi Tamas, I have to do that little bit of extra work to give you an idea about this. With the season over, I have looked at every Liga 1 club that had either very little or absolutely nothing to fight for in the last few rounds and this is an overview of the U20 players (would have had very little to write, if I had restricted the research to the U18 category) promoted and used in the final part of the campaign. Beware, the results are frightening…
- FC Vaslui
Final position: 5th
1. Alexandru Buziuc – born 1994, played 2 games as a substitute, for a total of 43 minutes spent on the pitch.
2. Adrian Nenita – born 1996, was offered a debut in the last round. Played 2 (two) minutes.
Final position: 6th
1. Alin Roman – born 1994, played 1 game. To be more accurate, played 17 minutes.
2. Dorin Rotariu – born 1995, played 7 games, but was a starter just once. In the other 6 games, was on the pitch for less than 20 minutes. Without any logic, he wasn’t used at all in the last 3 rounds…
3. Andrei Radu – born 1996, was offered a debut in round 32 and stayed just under 30 minuted on the pitch.
- FC Brasov
Final position: 7th
1. Florin Dumbrava – born 1995, was handed a debut in round 33 and played 14 minutes.
2. Rares Enceanu – born 1994. Made his debut in the top flight two seasons ago. In this one, played 4 times as a substitute, each time less than 30 minutes. Was among the starters only once and he scored 2 goals in that game. Obviously, in the following round, he was just a substitute again (we don’t want him to get too confident!) and played just 12 minutes…
- CFR Cluj
Final position: 8th
The former champion club and finalist in the last edition of the Romanian Cup didn’t use a single U20 player last season.
- Rapid Bucharest
Final position: 9th
1. Nicolae Vasile – born 1995, played 90 minutes 11 times this season.
2.Alexandru Ionita – born 1994, played 11 matches and was among the starters 5 times.
The use of these players came mostly as a consequence of Rapid’s bankrupcy and the reality that the team will be relegated at the end of the season, with no money or first team players…
- Gaz Metan Medias
Final position: 10th
Not a single U20 player used in the final part of the previous season.
Final position: 11th
1. Alexandru Tudorie – born 1996, played 32 + 12 minutes in the last two rounds. You do the maths, keeping in mind that this one is considered the hottest prospect of his generation.
- Universitatea Cluj
Final position: 12th
Champions of the U17 championship in the summer of 2012, Universitatea didn’t field a single U20 player in this second part of the season, although the club has the same fate as Rapid.
As you can see, I have not included here the clubs that fought for a place in Europe and those who battled against relegation. I went for clubs that had nothing left to fight as the end of the previous season approached, yet they simply avoided to hand debuts and offer playing minutes in Liga 1 to their most promising youngsters. These guys, some of them quite talented, have no other option than to play in the (terrible) youth league until they turn 19, afterwards, their only chance is to convince a coach that they’re ready to play senior football. So few of them make this step not only because most of the averafe quality of the majority, but because of a terrible mentality installed in football clubs, fueled by very poor coaches, who prefer the mistakes of mediocre older (foreign) players over those made by kids who “lack experience”. The youngsters have only one chance to change this: fake their ID’s like most of the African players, but in a different way: try to look a bit older!